IN the book "A guide to channels and circuits" explanations are given about the abstract way of thinking.
It literally says:
"As it moves through life the abstract mind is taking things in through the left eye....These sequences are then stored in the deep gray areas of the brain. As we recall these sequences they flow through the 64 gate and create a pressure in the mind that we call either inspiration or confusion.....The abstract way is to try and fill the gaps in these sequences. That is why History is never accurate. History is always subjective.....We read 12 things on a statue and then we fill in all the rest. We create a civilization by filling in all the spaces.
....This is not real lying in the sense that they want to lie. It is always that they are lending their own perspective to things; they are filling the spaces. Thus the important thing about the abstract mind is that the sequences themselves are legitimate. The abstract mind can be likened to the children's game of "join the dots"......With all this potential confusion in the 64th gateyou can imagine the pressure on the 47th gate. In order for such a mind to be at peace, it should never be relied upon for truth or favt, but should rather be appreciated for it's creative stories.
The 64/47s are the great casual minds. Men in particular would rather tell stories than talk about something logical. If you are an abstract thinker you are at your best telling a story".

I've got a wider perspective on the abstract mind and wanted to let it out of my brain even when I have not been invited. Here it goes:
Filling the spaces is not about conscious or unconscious lying only. AS the abstract mind is not there just for us to tell stories or make history up. However the abstract mind can be used for those purposes indeed.
I do not mean to say that filling the spaces is always accurate.
I am not saying either that History is not created by this way of thinking.
Joining all the dots and eventually making a picture is what scientists call: pattern recognition and this is the highest way of intelligence. Abstract minds are at their best when recognising patterns. So, if you are an abstract thinker you are at your best recognising patterns. telling stories is a by-product of your mind, one very enjoyable indeed.
This is what the abstract mind does in filling the gaps: it recognizes visual patterns.
History would be a product of this way of thinking, but this channel is here for visual pattern recognition.

If you have ever gone through an IQ test and have been able to get to the part of pattern recognition, you will immediately identify what you do: filling in the spaces as you play with alternatives and combine them.
Pattern recognition is not about experimenting or projecting into the future. It is not aboutr following a logic line. It is about seeing sequences, simultaneously (something impossible for the logical mind, so if you are a logical thinker, do not try this in an IQ test) getting in more sequences and organize them in a simultaneous fashion until your picture is perfect. That’s the abstract mind working.
So, the abstract mind can be likened to children's game of "join the dots"...Uhhmmm! it reminds me that children are better are recognising patterns than computers. Computers are big logic monsters, computers are better at logic than humans could ever be. However even children are better than the best computer at abstract thinking (pattern recognition0. A very unique way of thinking.

So dear abstract minds: I believe Ra has a logic-mind only. "The voice" had no time to explain about the abstract mind issue.

It is hardly believable however that mutations happened to develop this abstract circuit with the only evolutionary purpose of humans talking about history in an unaccurate way, or of telling each other stories.
Evolution took million of years for creating an entire circuit to just give us the capacity of inaccurate thinking and of making things up in a subjective way?
Uhhhmm!????
A collective circuit for a totally subjective outcome? Uhhhmmm!!! That would be something like “stupid evolution”.
What do you think?
I believe that the breakthrough of inspiration is far from being explained in HD text books. Confusion however is given an important one.
What's going on?